Jones v. Polk County District Court et al
ORDER overruling objections and accepting the magistrate judge's 6 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 10/22/2020. (bjc, )
Case 9:19-cv-00081-RC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 32
** NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION **
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19cv81
POLK COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, ET AL. §
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ACCEPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Elvis Wayne Jones, an inmate at the Polunsky Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the
above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review
of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
After consideration of plaintiff’s mostly undecipherable objections, the court concludes
the objections are factually insufficient and without merit. For the reasons set forth in the Report,
plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Case 9:19-cv-00081-RC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 33
Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. A final
judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s
So ORDERED and SIGNED, Oct 22, 2020.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?