Vessell v. Newman et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Newman is GRANTED. The claims against defendants Newman and Price are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 1/18/23. (ljw, )

Download PDF
Case 9:19-cv-00129-MAC-ZJH Document 15 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT LEON D. VESSELL, Plaintiff, versus MITCHELL NEWMAN, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-129 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Leon D. Vessell, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit against Mitchell Newman and James D. Price. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a motion to dismiss filed by defendant Newman be granted. The magistrate judge also recommended that the claim against defendant Price be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Newman is GRANTED. The claims against defendants Newman and Price are DISMISSED. A final judgment shall be entered. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 18th day of January, 2023. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?