Farmer v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING 9 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 1/6/21. (jmv, )

Download PDF
Case 9:19-cv-00210-RC-KFG Document 11 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 126 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION PARRISH FARMER § VS. § TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, et al., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-210 ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Parrish Farmer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against numerous defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Lufkin, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this civil rights action be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (docket entry no. 9). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date. 1 ORDER The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in 1 Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2020 (docket entry no. 10). Case 9:19-cv-00210-RC-KFG Document 11 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 127 accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. So ORDERED and SIGNED, Jan 06, 2021. ____________________ Ron Clark Senior Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?