Moore v. Lindley et al

Filing 102

ORDER ADOPTING 99 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/12/22. (ljw, )

Case 9:20-cv-00121-TH-CLS Document 102 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 749

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
KEENAN DEWAYNE MOORE

§

VS.

§

ANITRA LINDLEY, ET AL.

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv121

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Keenan Dewayne Moore, an inmate at the Eastham Unit, proceeding pro se, brought
this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The magistrate judge recommends denying plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No.
87).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available
evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were
filed by the parties. Plaintiff filed a response to the Report in which he asserted that an injunction
should not issue in this case because his legal work has been returned to him. Accordingly,
plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is now moot.

Case 9:20-cv-00121-TH-CLS Document 102 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 750

ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct
and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED.

SIGNED this the 12 day of September, 2022.

____________________________
Thad Heartfield
United States District Judge

2