Hicks v. Ford

Filing 6

ORDER ACCEPTING 4 Report and Recommendations. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the Magistrate Judges recommendations. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 1/6/21. (jmv, )

Download PDF
Case 9:20-cv-00150-RC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8 ** NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION BLAZE HICKS § VS. § BRADLEY FORD, JAILER TYLER COUNTY JAIL § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20-CV-150 ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Blaze Hicks, a pre-trial detainee confined at the Tyler County Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Bradley Ford. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Lufkin, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing this case for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (docket entry no. 4). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date. 1 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in this 1 Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on October 19, 2020 (docket entry no. 5). Case 9:20-cv-00150-RC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9 case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. So ORDERED and SIGNED, Jan 06, 2021. ____________________ Ron Clark Senior Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?