Hill v. Davis

Filing 7

ORDER accepting 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this case should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 01/06/2021. (bmf, )

Download PDF
Case 9:20-cv-00192-RC-KFG Document 7 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 13 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION JOSEPH WAYNE HILL § VS. § LORIE DAVIS § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20-CV-192 ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Joseph Wayne Hill, a prisoner confined at the Eastham Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Lorie Davis. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing this civil rights action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. Case 9:20-cv-00192-RC-KFG Document 7 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 14 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** ORDER The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 5) is ACCEPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So ORDERED and SIGNED, Jan 06, 2021. ____________________ Ron Clark Senior Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?