Latham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 3/1/21. (tkd, )
Case 9:21-cv-00035-RC-KFG Document 4 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 51
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
VINCENT LEE LATHAM
§
VS.
§
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv64
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER
Petitioner Vincent Lee Latham, an inmate confined at the Wynne Unit of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this
petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge
for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.
Discussion
On November 1, 2017, in the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas, petitioner
was convicted of Aggravated Robbery. Petitioner sentenced to a term of life imprisonment in the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. Petitioner brings this
petition alleging he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a petitioner may bring his petition for writ of habeas corpus
in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the
district within which he was convicted. Section 2241(d) further provides that the district court in
the exercise of its discretion may transfer the action to the other district in the furtherance of justice.
Case 9:21-cv-00035-RC-KFG Document 4 Filed 03/01/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 52
Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Nacogdoches County which is located in the
Lufkin Division of the Eastern District of Texas. Thus, jurisdiction is proper in the Eastern District
of Texas. However, the petition has been inadvertently filed in the Beaumont Division instead of
the Lufkin Division.
While jurisdiction is proper in the Eastern District of Texas, the court has considered the
circumstances and has determined that the interest of justice would best be served if this petition
were transferred to the division in which the petitioner was convicted.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest
of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it could
have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only for an abuse of
.
discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989).
Since petitioner complains of a conviction which occurred in the Lufkin Division, all records
and witnesses involving this action most likely will be located in the Lufkin Division. Thus, the
transfer of this action to such division would further justice. Therefore, it is the opinion of the
undersigned that this petition should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Lufkin Division. An Order of Transfer so providing shall be entered in accordance
with this Memorandum Opinion.
SIGNED this the 1st day of March, 2021.
____________________________________
KEITH F. GIBLIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?