Biziko v. Van Horne et al
Filing
87
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the 83 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Cour t. For the reasons states therein, 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 75 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/4/2019) (jmc)
IN THE LINITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ABILENE DIVISION
AMBER BIZIKO,
)
)
)
)
Plaintifl
)
)
STEVEN VAN HORNE, et a/.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Civil Action No. l: l6-CV-l 1 1-C
ORDER
Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United
Stares Magistrate Judge advising the Court that
Plaintifls Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
should be granted in part and denied in part. The Magistrate Judge has further advised that
Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment be denied. The Parties have failed to file
objections and the time to do so has now expired.
The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error
and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
are hereby
ADoPTED
as the
findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated
therein, Plaintiffls Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART, Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.
SO ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2019.
IN S
C
SAM
SENIOR TINITED STATES DISTzu
UDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?