Huluwazu v. Secretary of the Air Force, et al
Filing
7
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations 6 and ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and is accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reaso ns stated in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the above-styled and numbered civil action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) an/or 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/4/2017) (jmc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ABILENE DIVISION
PAP A HUL UWAZU, formerly known as,
Craig Anthony Dillard,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-CV-077-C
)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l),
the Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct
and is accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 1 For the reasons stated in the Report
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the above-styled and -numbered civil
action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) and/or 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B).
J
SIGNED this£ day of December, 2017.
1
Plaintiff failed to file a timely objection within 14 days from the date of the Report and
Recommendation.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?