Mercado v. Big Country Mufflers and Auto Repair et al

Filing 18

ORDER. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations, Dkt. No. 16 , only for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to comply with Court Orders. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/6/2024) (amg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N o R' Ex As T#il'ffi Hi:,3,31,' JAIME MERCADO, Plaintiff, No. 1:23-CY-104-H-BU v BIG COUNTRY MUFFLERS AND AUTO REPAIR, et dl., Defendants ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) due to the plaintiffs failure to prosecute and comply with Court Orders. Dkt. No. 16. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are fi.led within the 74-day period, the Court reviews the Magisuate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain enor. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiffs claims against the defendants are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to comply with Court Orders. So ordered on February 4 ,2024. JAMES Y HENDRIX STATES DISTRICT JUDGE See

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?