Williams v. U S Marshals Service et al
Filing
11
ORDER Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation re: 3 Complaint. The civil rights lawsuit filed by plaintiff Alex Christopher Williams is dismissed. Plaintiff's unlawful seizure claim is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and his excessive force claim is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/6/2019) (awc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION
ALEX CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. MARSHAL’S SERVICE, and
MATTHEW E. CLAY,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
2:18-CV-0102-M-BR
ORDER
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case and
the February 20, 2019 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the
Court concludes the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Conclusions are correct. The
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted, and the civil rights lawsuit filed by
plaintiff Alex Christopher Williams is dismissed. Plaintiff’s unlawful seizure claim is dismissed
with prejudice as frivolous and his excessive force claim is dismissed without prejudice for
failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.
SO ORDERED this 6th day of June, 2019.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?