Stanley, Mandel & Iola LLP v. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP et al

Filing 4

ORDER. Accordingly, no later than August 24, 2006, Plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(f) so that the courtcan ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Signed by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/14/06) (jrb, )

Download PDF
Stanley, Mandel & Iola LLP v. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP et al Doc. 4 Case 3:06-cv-01442 Document 4 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION STANLEY, MANDEL & IOLA, L.L.P., Plaintiff, v. MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD & SCHULMAN, L.L.P., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1442-L ORDER On August 11, 2006, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this case but did not provide the clerk with a certificate of interested persons. Local Civil Rule 3.1(f) requires that [w]hen a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must provide the clerk with . . . a separately signed certificate of interested persons that contains a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the case. If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary. Accordingly, no later than August 24, 2006, Plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(f) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. It is so ordered this 14th day of August, 2006. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order - Solo Page Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?