Weinberg v. National Football League Players Association et al

Filing 18

Agreed MOTION to Extend Time by Richard Berthelsen, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, John Collins, Keith Washington, Mark Levin, National Football League Players Association (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Miller, Ralph)

Download PDF
Weinberg v. National Football League Players Association et al Doc. 18 Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 18 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Steve Weinberg, Plaintiff, vs. National Football League Players Association, Richard Berthelsen, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, Roger Kaplan, John Collins, Keith Washington, Tony Agnone, Howard Shatsky, and Mark Levin, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3-06-CV2332-B ECF NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND TO FILE DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS THE PETITION Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants National Football League Players Association ("NFLPA"), Richard Berthelsen, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, Keith Washington, John Collins, and Mark Levin (collectively, the "NFLPA Defendants"), hereby move for a two week extension of time, until March 6, 2007, to file the NFLPA Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and for a two week extension of time, until March 1, 2007, to file the NFLPA Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition. In support of this Motion, the NFLPA Defendants state as follows: NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DA1:\470704\02\@37402!.DOC\64922.0232 PAGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 18 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND 1. The Petition. On or about November 20, 2006, Plaintiff Steven Weinberg filed his First Amended Petition in Steve Weinberg v. National Football League Players Assoc., et al., Cause No. 06-11845, in the District Court for the 95th Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas (the "Petition").1 2. The Removal. On or about December 18, 2006, the NFLPA Defendants timely removed this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The non-NFLPA Defendants in this action (Defendants Kaplan, Shatsky, and Agnone), consented to the removal. 3. The NFLPA Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition. On January 9, 2007, the NFLPA Defendants' filed their Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition. 4. Plaintiff's Expedited Agreed Motion for Extension of Time. On January 16, 2007, counsel for the NFLPA Defendants consented to Plaintiff's Expedited Agreed Motion for Extension of Time requesting an Order extending Plaintiff's deadline, until January 31, 2007, to file Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and to file Plaintiff's Response to the NFLPA Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition ("Plaintiff's Agreed Motion"). Plaintiff filed its Agreed Motion on January 16, 2007. 5. NFLPA Defendants Current Filing Deadlines. Pursuant to local rules, the NFLPA Defendants are required to file their response to Plaintiff's Motion to 1 Defendants specifically preserve and do not waive any and all applicable defenses, including, without limitation, those pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and any right to demand arbitration. Moreover, certain parties may challenge Texas' in personam jurisdiction over them. NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DA1:\470704\02\@37402!.DOC\64922.0232 PAGE 2 Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 18 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 3 of 5 Remand on or by February 20, 2007, and are required to file a reply to Plaintiff's Response to the NFLPA Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition on or by February 15, 2007. MOTION 6. In the absence of improper prejudice to a party, the Court enjoys broad discretion over the administration of its cases. See, e.g., Macklin v. City of New Orleans, 293 F.3d 237, 240 (5th Cir. 2002) ("As there is no indication that the district court exercised leniency unfairly [in extending filing deadlines] or otherwise improperly prejudiced [the plaintiff], we find no abuse of discretion."). Moreover, Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits the Court, in its discretion, to enlarge a period of time "for cause" when a request is made prior to the expiration of time originally allowed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). 7. Given the complex and numerous issues expected to be presented in Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and in Plaintiff's Response to the NFLPA Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition, counsel for the NFLPA Defendants asked counsel for Plaintiff to agree to a two week extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and to a two week extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff's Response to the NFLPA Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition. 8. On January 16, 2007, counsel for Plaintiff, Bart F. Higgins, agreed to the NFLPA Defendants' request for an extension of time. CONCLUSION AND REQUESTED RELIEF The NFLPA Defendants respectfully request an Order extending their deadline to file the NFLPA Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand for NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DA1:\470704\02\@37402!.DOC\64922.0232 PAGE 3 Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 18 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 4 of 5 two weeks, until March 6, 2007, and extending their deadline to file the NFLPA Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition for two weeks, until March 1, 2007. Dated: January 22, 2006 Respectfully submitted, s/ Ralph I. Miller Ralph I. Miller Texas Bar No. 14105800 Aaron D. Ford Texas Bar No. 24034445 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 746-7700 Facsimile: (214) 746-7777 ralph.miller@weil.com aaron.ford@weil.com Jeffrey L. Kessler (pro hac vice) Adam J. Kaiser (pro hac vice) David Greenspan (pro hac vice) Molly Donovan (pro hac vice) DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019-6092 Telephone: (212) 259-8000 Facsimile: (212) 259-6333 jkessler@deweyballantine.com akaiser@deweyballantine.com dgreenspan@deweyballantine.com mdonovan@deweyballantine.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, RICHARD BERTHELSEN, GENE UPSHAW, TOM DEPASO, TRACE ARMSTRONG, KEITH WASHINGTON, JOHN COLLINS, AND MARK LEVIN NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DA1:\470704\02\@37402!.DOC\64922.0232 PAGE 4 Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 18 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE This is to certify that on January 16, 2007, counsel for the NFLPA Defendants sent an e-mail message to counsel for Plaintiff Steve Weinberg, Bart F. Higgins, confirming Plaintiff's verbal agreement to a two week extension of time, until March 6, 2007, for the NFLPA Defendants to file their Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and for a two week extension of time, until March 1, 2007, to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition. s/ Aaron D. Ford Aaron D. Ford CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On January 22, 2007, I electronically transmitted the foregoing NFLPA Defendants' Agreed Motion For Extension of Time To File Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and To File Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof using the ECF System for filing a Notice of Electronic Filing to those parties registered for ECF in this case. I further certify that the foregoing document was served on all counsel of record by ECF. s/ Aaron D. Ford Aaron D. Ford NFLPA DEFENDANTS' AGREED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DA1:\470704\02\@37402!.DOC\64922.0232 PAGE 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?