Chang et al v. Virgin Mobile USA LLC et al

Filing 44

ORDER: Pursuant to the District Court's Order (doc. 41), Defendant Virgin Mobile Pty Ltd.'s objection to making FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures, filed March 3, 2008, has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for hearing, if necessary, and to determine what disclosures, if any, are to be made, and to determine a time for disclosure. The Court will hear the objection on THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008, at 9:00 A.M. (see order for specifics) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 03/18/08) (lmp)

Download PDF
Chang et al v. Virgin Mobile USA LLC et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SUSAN CHANG, as Next Friend of A.C., a Minor, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VIRGIN MOBILE USA, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-1767-D ORDER Pursuant to the District Court's Order (doc. 41), Defendant Virgin Mobile Pty Ltd.'s objection to making FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures, filed March 3, 2008, has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for hearing, if necessary, and to determine what disclosures, if any, are to be made, and to determine a time for disclosure. The Court will hear the objection on THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2008, at 9:00 A.M. in United States Magistrate Judge's Courtroom 1561, 1100 Commerce Street, Dallas, Texas.1 Counsel are expected to have fully conferred pusuant to Local Rule 7.1(a) and Dondi2 on all of the matters in controversy. SO ORDERED. March 18, 2008. _____________________________________ PAUL D. STICKNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1. Requests to reschedule the hearing will be entertained but must be discussed with opposing counsel prior to contacting the Court. 2. Dondi Props. Corp. v. Commerce Savs. & Loan Ass'n, 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988). See the discussion regarding proper utilization of Local Rule 7.1(a). Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?