Chang et al v. Virgin Mobile USA LLC et al

Filing 76

MOTION to Withdraw 71 Objection to Defendant's Bill of Costs filed by Susan Chang, Justin Ho-Wee Wong. (Zehl, Ryan) Modified on 4/16/2009 (axm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SUSAN CHANG, AS NEXT FRIEND OF ALISON CHANG, A MINOR, AND JUSTIN HO-WEE WONG, PLAINTIFFS VS. VIRGIN MOBILE PTY LTD., DEFENDANT. § § § § § § § § § § § § § CA No. 3:07-cv-1767 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S BILL OF COSTS Plaintiffs file this motion respectfully requesting that the Court withdraw its motion objecting to Defendant’s bill of costs, which was submitted to the Clerk on January 28, 2008. HOUDMS/223999.1 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Ryan H. Zehl____________________ Ryan H. Zehl State Bar No. 24047166 Fitts Zehl, LLP 5065 Westheimer Rd., Suite 700 Houston, Texas 77056 (713) 491-6064 (telephone) (713) 583-1492 (facsimile) rzehl@fittszehl.com Mark W. Romney State Bar No. 17225750 Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 2500 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 245-3062 (telephone) (214) 245-3097 (facsimile) mromney@shannongracey.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS -2Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Reset Rule 26(f) Conference CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 14 day of April 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the Court’s electronic case filing system. The system sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to the following attorneys of record, all of whom have consented to accept this Notice as service of the document: Lisa H. Meyerhoff Baker & McKenzie LLP 2001 Ross Ave. Dallas, Texas 75201 /s/ Ryan H. Zehl______________________ Ryan H. Zehl -3Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Reset Rule 26(f) Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?