Oblio Telecom Inc v. Patel et al

Filing 81

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 74 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Zuber Patel, 73 MOTION for Attorney Fees or Alternatively for Issuance of An Order to Show Cause. The court denies Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees or Alternatively for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (doc. 73), filed October 16, 2009, and denies Defendant Zuber Patel's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees (doc. 74), filed October 22, 2009. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/8/2010) (tln)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION OBLIO TELECOM, INC., Plaintiff, v. ZUBER PATEL, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-0279-L ORDER Before the court are the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed December 22, 2009. No objections were filed. Defendants Hawaii Global Exchange, Inc., Transpac Telecom, Inc., and Zubar Patel filed motions for attorney's fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the court's inherent powers. The magistrate judge recommends denying their motions. The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report, the record, and the applicable law, and determines that the findings are correct and are therefore accepted as those of the court. The court therefore denies Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees or Alternatively for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (doc. 73), filed October 16, 2009, and denies Defendant Zuber Patel's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees (doc. 74), filed October 22, 2009. It is so ordered this 8th day of January, 2010. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order ­ Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?