Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Plambeck et al
Filing
462
ORDER Accepting 455 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge as to Roland G. Toca II. Defendant Toca' s pleadings will be stricken and interlocutory default judgment entered against him on the issue of liability. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/20/2011) (jrb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
VS.
MICHAEL KENT PLAMBECK, D.C.,
ET AL.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
NO. 3-08-CV-0388-M-BD
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and
the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 26,
2011, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are
correct as to Roland G. Toca II, and they are accepted as the Findings and Recommendation
of the Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge as to Roland G. Toca II are accepted. The court finds that
Defendant Roland G. Toca II failed to appear at a pretrial status conference without
justification or excuse. As a result, sanctions are appropriate under Rule 16(f) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Toca' s pleadings will be stricken and interlocutory
default judgment entered against him on the issue of liability. Plaintiffs will be permitted to
submit evidence to the court on the issue of damages and move for the entry of a final default
judgment upon the trial of this cause.
SO ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2011.
_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?