Niblet v. Gulfstream Aerospace

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING 26 THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Venue is DENIED AS MOOT. This case is stayed and administratively closed pending arbitration. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/23/2010) (dnc)

Download PDF
Niblet v. Gulfstream Aerospace Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RICKEY A. NIBLET, Plaintiff, v. GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:10-CV-0120-K ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Arbitration" is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Venue is DENIED AS MOOT. The parties shall submit this case to arbitration, and this case is stayed and administratively closed pending arbitration. There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as open for statistical purposes. The Clerk is therefore instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records. Nothing in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this case, Dockets.Justia.com and when arbitration is complete, any party or the Court may initiate such further proceedings in the same manner as if this Order had not been entered. Signed July 23, 2010. ED KINKEADE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?