Reagan v. Peterson et al
Filing
66
ORDER ACCEPTING THE 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 11/15/2012) (tln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
DARREN L. REAGAN,
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
JOHN DE LA GARZA, AUSA,
)
WILBUR M. GREGORY, JR., SSA,
)
Federal Bureau of Investigation, and
)
ALAN HAMPTON, SA, Internal Revenue Servic)e.
Defendants.
)
Civ. No. 3:11-CV-0004-M-BF
ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. Plaintiff filed objections on November 13, 2012, and the District
Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings and Recommendation
to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has previously
dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s claims against Alan Hampton.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) is granted. Plaintiff’s
claims against the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, John De La Garza, and
William M. Gregory, Jr., in their official capacities, are dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction based upon sovereign immunity.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56 is granted.
Plaintiff’s claims against John De La Garza and William M. Gregory, Jr., in their individual
capacities, are dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2012.
_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?