Foodsource v. Metro Produce Inc et al
Filing
27
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 24 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Foodsource. Plaintiff is instructed to file a motion for reasonable attorney's fees and costs by June 27, 2011. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/17/2011) (tln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
FOODSOURCE,
Plaintiff,
v.
METRO PRODUCE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0714-L
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion of Plaintiff for Default Judgment Against Defendants,
filed June 9, 2011. After consideration of the motion, brief, record, and applicable law, the court
grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants.
I.
Background
This is a breach of contract claim brought by Plaintiff Foodsource against Defendants Metro
Produce, Inc. and Vijay Singhal (“Defendants”). Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this court on April
7, 2011, seeking relief against Defendants under Section 5(c) of the Perishable Agricultural
Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c). The action arises out of a contract in which Plaintiff agreed
to provide Defendants with perishable agricultural products and, in turn, Defendants were to make
full payment for the produce at a later date. Defendants ultimately defaulted on the transaction and
refused to pay the balance, despite Plaintiff’s demands.
Defendants were properly served on April 25, 2011, and to date have not filed an answer to
Plaintiff’s Complaint or otherwise defended in this lawsuit. Plaintiff requested the clerk to issue
entry of default on May 19, 2011, and default was entered by the clerk on May 19, 2011. Plaintiff
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 1
now requests entry of default judgment against Defendants for money owed under the terms of the
contract; Plaintiff further requests prejudgment interest and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
II.
Analysis
The court finds that because Defendants have neither filed an answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint
nor otherwise defended in this lawsuit, and because Defendants are not infants, incompetent or in
the military, Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against Defendants. The court therefore accepts as true
the well-pleaded allegations stated by Plaintiff in its Complaint, the facts in Plaintiff’s Motion for
Default Judgment Against Defendants, and those set forth in the brief accompanying the motion.
A.
Damages
“A default judgment is a judgment on the merits that conclusively establishes the defendant’s
liability. But it does not establish the amount of damages.” See United States v. Shipco Gen., 814
F.2d 1011, 1014 (5th Cir. 1987) (citing TWA v. Hughes, 449 F.2d 51, 70 (2nd Cir. 1971)), rev’d on
other grounds, 409 U.S. 363 (1973); G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Co., 639 F.2d 29,
34 (1st Cir. 1980)). Plaintiff asks the court to award $53,571 in damages, which is the principal
balance outstanding and owed by Defendants under the terms of the contract, as set forth in the
Complaint. Plaintiff further requests the court to award it prejudgment interest as of June 9, 2011,
in the amount of $9,070.85. The court determines that such damages are ascertainable from the
complaint, Plaintiff’s motion, and the brief attached to it. The court further determines that since
the contract provided for the collection of interest incurred in collecting sums due, the award of
prejudgment interest is warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to a total amount of $62,641.85.
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 2
B.
Costs and Attorney’s Fees
Plaintiff also seeks the collection of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff has not
provided the court with documentation of earned attorney’s fees and costs. Accordingly, Plaintiff
is instructed to file a motion for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs with a detailed description of
the fees and costs incurred.
III.
Conclusion
For the reasons herein stated, the court grants Plaintiff’s Motion of Plaintiff for Default
Judgment Against Defendants. Accordingly, the court hereby orders that default judgment be
entered for Plaintiff in the amount of $62,641.85 ($53,571 in damages and $9,070.85 in prejudgment
interest), plus postjudgment interest thereon at the applicable federal rate. Plaintiff is instructed
to file a motion for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs by June 27, 2011. In its motion, Plaintiff
must set forth the amount of attorney’s fees requested, the bases for the request, and the bases for
the reasonableness of the fees requested. If this information is not provided, the court will deny
Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees. In accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, judgment will issue by separate document.
It is so ordered this 17th day of June, 2011.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?