Jordan v. Fitzsimmons et al

Filing 20

ORDER ACCEPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 13 letter motion requesting copies of unspecified documents free of charge and Plaintiffs 17 motion requesting that the Court order the Clerk to serve the Defendants. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/3/2011) (jrb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TOMMY EARL JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. GARY FITZSIMMONS, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § 3:11-CV-1026-K ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed documents on September 21, 2011, which the Court construes as objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. Further, Plaintiff filed Objections on September 29, 2011. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s letter motion requesting copies of unspecified documents free of charge (Doc. 13) and Plaintiff’s motion requesting that the Court order the Clerk to serve the Defendants. (Doc. 17) The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Order accepting the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the above Order, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). SO ORDERED. Signed this 3rd day of October, 2011. _________________________________ ED KINKEADE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?