Sherman et al v. Emke et al

Filing 6

ORDER Adopting Bankruptcy Court's 5 Recommendation of the United States Bankruptcy Judge. An Order granting in part Mike Emke's 2 Motion to Withdraw the Reference shall be entered. (Ordered by Judge Royal Furgeson on 8/23/2011) (axm)

Download PDF
u.s. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ClRT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF T XAS DALLAS DIVISION INREONDOVA ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, Debtor DANIEL 1. SHERMAN, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE Plaintiff, vs. MIKE EMKE AND SERVERS, INC Defendants § § § § § § § § § § § § § § r= FILED AUG 23 2011 C~;RK. U.S~'JCT CO~RT eputy :/: 4171--­ Civil Action No.3: ll-cv-1971-F Adversary No. 11-03181-SGJ ORDER ADOPTING BANKRUPTCY COURT'S RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE BEFORE THE COURT is United States Bankruptcy Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No.5), which recommends that the bankruptcy court bifurcate Counts 3 and 4 (claims involving allegations that Mike Emke breached development obligations under the settlement agreement and that Plaintiff is entitled to monetary damages) from the remaining counts in the Adversary Proceeding; that the bankruptcy court finally adjudicate through a bench trial all matters in the Adversary Proceeding except Counts 3 and 4 (core bankruptcy matters involving the sale and liquidation of property of the estate); and that the Court withdraw the reference as to Counts 3 and 4 and hold a jury trial therein, at such time as the bankruptcy court has certified that the parties are ready for trial, with the bankruptcy court to preside over all pre-trial matters. 1 After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation shem1d be ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. An Order granting in part Mike Emke's Motion to Withdraw the Reference (Doc. 2) shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this ~t:!day of August, 2011. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?