Denton et al v. Suter
Filing
171
ORDER ACCEPTING 169 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Amended Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated 1/19/2016, the Court finds that the Amended Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/16/2016) (bdb)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PETER DENTON, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
V.
RUDOLF SUTER,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
No. 3:11-cv-2559-N
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this
case, and the Amended Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge dated January 19, 2016, the Court finds that the Amended
Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and
they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.
SO ORDERED this 16th day of February 2016.
_____________________________________
DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
