Wu et al v. Frost National Bank

Filing 19

ORDER Accepting 13 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The claims of plaintiff Lan Wu are dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/30/2012) (axm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAN WU, Plaintiff, vs. FROST NATIONAL BANK Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-0772-M-BH Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The claims of plaintiff Lan Wu are DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED this 30th day of May, 2012. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAN WU, GARY GILLIAM, SCENIC ENTERPRISES, LLC., Plaintiffs, vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FROST NATIONAL BANK Defendant. No. 3:12-CV-0772-M-BH Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, plaintiffs’ claims will be DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED this day of , 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?