James v. Tobolowski et al

Filing 10

ORDER ACCEPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff is BARRED from filing any suits in this Court without first seeking leave. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/6/2012) (cea)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRY R. JAMES, Plaintiff, § § § v. § 3:12-CV-0910-M-BK § JUDGE EMILY TOBOLOWSKY, § ET AL. § Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections on June 28, 2012, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is BARRED from filing any suits in this Court without first seeking leave. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Order accepting the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the above Order, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). SO ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2012. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?