Wilson et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Filing 73

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGESFINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re: 67 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 29 Motion for Sanctions filed by MiMi Wilson, Willie Wilson. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/6/2013) (ndt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WILLIE WILSON and MIMI WILSON, Plaintiffs, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1063-B ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions against Defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f) (doc. 29). Defendant has failed to object to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations within fourteen days as proscribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s finding and recommendations for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) advisory committee notes 1983 addition (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”). After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and recommendations are correct and free of clear error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States -1- Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. SO ORDERED. SIGNED May 6, 2013. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?