Woods v. United States District Court
Filing
15
ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/9/2012) (ctf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
TORI WOODS,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
3:12-CV-2256-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a
recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the
proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court
ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by
reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v.
Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation,
the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and
would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
SO ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2012.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?