Ruiz v. United States of America et al
Filing
7
ORDER ACCEPTING 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/4/2013) (tln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
APOLONIO LONGINOS RUIZ,
#43295177,
Plaintiff,
§
§
§
§
v.
§
§
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., §
Defendants.
§
3:12-CV-4096-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,
conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by
reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v.
Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation,
the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and
would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2013.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?