Wright v. E-Systems LLC et al
Order Accepting 75 Findings and Recommendations. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/17/2017) (epm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
E-SYSTEMS, LLC, et al.,
Civil No. 3:12-CV-4715-K-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and
recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Micheal Wright is awarded economic damages against E-Systems for
$7,875,000, awarded economic damages against PTC for $750,000, and awarded economic
damages against Covertglass for $750,000, plus annual interest of 0.84% on each award of
economic damages from the date of the judgment entered on November 4, 2014. Plaintiff is also
awarded his attorney’s fees of $19,956.90 and costs of $66.44, for which each Defendant is
jointly and severally responsible.
Finally, Plaintiff having satisfied the requisites for the entry of a permanent injunction,
Defendants and each of their partners, officers, directors, associates, agents, servants, and
employees, and all others acting or attempting to act in concert with Defendants, are hereby
prohibited from directly or indirectly infringing Micheal Wright’s patents, specifically, the
6,556,337 and 6,714,340 Patents, awarded on Aril 29, 2003 and March 30, 2004, respectively,
and from continuing to sell, market, offer, dispose of, license, transfer, display, advertise,
reproduce, develop, or manufacture any services, events, products, or goods that infringe on such
Signed January 17th, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?