Ross v. Valdez et al
Order Adopting 8 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/27/2013) (axm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BERNARD ROSS, #12034507,
SHERIFF VALDEZ, et al.,
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the
findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and
recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.
It is ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. §§
1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). The dismissal of this case counts as a “strike” or “prior occasion”
within the meaning 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the court adopts and incorporates by reference the
magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197,
202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the findings and recommendation, the court finds that any appeal
of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous.
Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
June 27, 2013.
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?