Evans v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Filing
61
ORDER ACCEPTING 57 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's 53 motion for reconsideration is construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), and the Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/6/2015) (tln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LAVELLE EVANS,
ID #1830990,
Petitioner,
vs.
WILLIAMS STEPHENS, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, Correctional Institutions Division,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:13-CV-0021-B (BH)
Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the
Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is construed as a motion to alter
or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), and the Rule 59(e) motion to alter
or amend judgment is hereby DENIED.
SIGNED this
6th
day of
January
, 2015.
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?