Nixon v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Corporation
Filing
46
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 43 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 5 Motion to Remand filed by Tracy Nixon. The Court has considered the record in this case, the proper authorities, as well as the instant motions/requests and finds that they are all patently frivolous and must be and are hereby DENIED and are STRICKEN from this case. Motions 38 , 40 , 41 , 42 terminated 5/14/2013. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 5/14/2013) (tla)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
TRACY NIXON,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 3:13-CV-0121-K
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any
objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s
Objections are hereby OVERRULED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, filed
on January 23, 2013 is DENIED.
Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, filed on April
24, 2013; Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike, filed on April 29, 2013; Plaintiff’s Motion for
Default Judgment, filed on April 29, 2013; and the Combined Request for Clerks Entry
of Default and Motion for Default Judgment, filed on May 6, 2013.
The Court has considered the record in this case, the proper authorities, as well
as the instant motions/requests and finds that they are all patently frivolous and must
be and are hereby DENIED and are STRICKEN from this case.
SO ORDERED.
Signed May 14th, 2013.
ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?