Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 14

ORDER ACCEPTING 13 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss, granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/9/2013) (tln)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HOMER THOMAS, Plaintiff, VS. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-0127-G (BF) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The court has under consideration the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The district court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, defendant Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, P.C. is DISMISSED from this lawsuit because it was improperly joined as a defendant and its motion to dismiss (docket entry 10) is DENIED as moot. Additionally, defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (docket entry 9) is GRANTED and plaintiff’s claims against these defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). SO ORDERED. August 9, 2013. ___________________________________ A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?