Ansari v. Napolitano et al
Filing
28
ORDER: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the Report, the court determines that the 27 findings and conclusions are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Petition as Moot (Doc. 22 ) and dismisses without prejudice this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/31/2014) (ctf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
v.
§
§
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of
§
the Department of Homeland Security, et al., §
§
Defendants.
§
ZEESHAN ALAM ANSARI,
Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-471-L
ORDER
The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on July 14,
2014, recommending that the court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Petition as Moot (Doc. 22),
filed November 19, 2013, and dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(1). No objections to the Report were filed.
Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the Report, the court
determines that the findings and conclusions are correct and accepts them as those of the court.
Accordingly, the court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Petition as Moot (Doc. 22) and
dismisses without prejudice this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for
lack of jurisdiction.
It is so ordered this 31st day of July, 2014.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?