Blanton v. USA

Filing 98

Order Accepting 97 Findings and Recommendations. The court construes Plaintiff's motion as a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c) and denies as moot his request for a 90-day extension to appeal. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/23/2015) (ykp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PRESTON BLANTON, 42100-177,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-774-L

ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for a 90-day extension to appeal the judgment entered
in this case (Doc. 95), filed April 28, 2015. On May 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo
Ramirez entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
(“Report”) (Doc. 97), recommending that the court construe Plaintiff’s motion as a notice of appeal
under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c) and deny as moot his request for a 90-day extension.
No objections to the Report were filed.
After considering the motion, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the
findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court.
Accordingly, the court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 3(c) and denies as moot his request for a 90-day extension to appeal. (Doc. 95).
It is so ordered this 23rd day of June, 2015.

_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge

Order – Solo Page