Lacy v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 9

Order: The court determines that the 6 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Petitioner's objections are overruled. Habeas corpus petition is successive, and the clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/8/2013) (twd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION NICHOLAS O. LACY, #607743, v. RICK THALER, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Div., § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-972-L ORDER Before the court is Nicholas O. Lacy’s (“Lacy” or “Petitioner”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, received by the court on March 5, 2013. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on April 2, 2013, recommending that Petitioner’s successive habeas petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider it absent authorization by the court of appeals. Lacy filed objections to the Report. The objections, however, do not cure the deficiency noted in the Report. After reviewing the pleadings, file, and record in this case, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. The court therefore overrules Petitioner’s objections and directs the clerk of the court to forward Lacy’s habeas petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for consideration. It is so ordered this 8th day of July, 2013. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?