Bunch v. Mollobashy et al
Filing
59
ORDER ACCEPTING 56 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's motion to stay due to extenuating circumstances, filed 5/27/2015 (docket entry 49 ) is DENIED, and defendant Dana Bond's first amended motion to dismiss for failure to serve proper notice and both defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice for failure to file pre-suit notices, filed 6/16/2015 (docket entry 52 at 3) are DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/7/2016) (sss)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
GLORIA A. BUNCH,
Plaintiff,
VS.
ALLADDIN MOLLABASHY, M.D.,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:13-CV-1075-G (BH)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the
undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of
the court.
Plaintiff’s motion to stay due to extenuating circumstances, filed May 27, 2015
(docket entry 49) is DENIED, and defendant Dana Bond’s first amended motion to
dismiss for failure to serve proper notice and both defendants’ motion to dismiss with
prejudice for failure to file pre-suit notices, filed June 16, 2015 (docket entry 52 at 3)
are DENIED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff’s claims against Dana Bond,
C.N.P. will be DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice for failure to comply with
FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m).
SO ORDERED.
March 7, 2016.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?