Mays v. Valdez et al

Filing 10

Order Accepting 9 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants' 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 11/29/2013) (axm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DERRECK MAYS, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF LUPE VALDEZ, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § NO. 3:13-cv-1272-M-BF ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 1, 2013, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff’s claims and causes of action against Sheriff Lupe Valdez are DISMISSED with prejudice, and Plaintiff’s claims against the unnamed Dallas police officers are DISMISSED until the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met. SO ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2013. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?