Wilkerson v. Thaler

Filing 59

Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge re: For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, petitioner's Motion for Relief From Judgment, received on 7/5/2013 51 , and F acts, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of Senrick Wilkerson, received on 7/9/2013 52 are construed as Rule 60(b) motions and are both DENIED. Because the Court denies petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, his Demand for Release from custody 56 is also denied. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/22/2013) (ndt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, ID # 10093432, Petitioner, vs. RICK THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-CV-1694-M-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, petitioner’s Motion for Relief From Judgment, received on July 5, 2013 (doc. 51), and Facts, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of Senrick Wilkerson, received on July 9, 2013 (doc. 52) are construed as Rule 60(b) motions and are both DENIED. Because the Court denies petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment, his Demand for Release from custody (doc. 56) is also denied. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2013. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?