Gee v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER HABEAS PETITION re: 9 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, ) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 5/8/2013.]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CHRIS KEVIN GEE, Petitioner, VS. RICK THALER, Respondent. § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-00409 § § § § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER HABEAS PETITION On April 17, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Transfer Habeas Petition” (D.E. 9). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 9), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this petition for writ of 1/2 habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2013. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?