West v. Meade et al

Filing 13

Order Accepting 9 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/29/2013) (axm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JAMES WEST JR.,
Plaintiff,
V.
ANGELINA MEADE, ET AL.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

No. 3:13-cv-2306-N

ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and
recommendations in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has
made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and
recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the
Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States
Magistrate Judge.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good
faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and
incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based
on the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal
of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be
frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

SO ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2013

DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE