Oliver v. United States

Filing 8

Order: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the 7 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and denies as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/23/2013) (cea)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HAYWARD W. OLIVER, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-2386-L ORDER This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on August 27, 2013, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5), filed June 21, 2013, be denied. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and denies as moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5). It is so ordered this 23rd day of September, 2013. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?