Oliver v. United States
Filing
8
Order: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the 7 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and denies as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/23/2013) (cea)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
HAYWARD W. OLIVER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-2386-L
ORDER
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered the Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on August 27,
2013, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5), filed June 21, 2013, be denied. No objections to the Report were filed.
Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are
correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice
this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute and denies as
moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5).
It is so ordered this 23rd day of September, 2013.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?