Gipson et al v. JP Morgan Chase

Filing 18

ORDER: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge (Doc. 17 ) are correct, and accepts them a s those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 12 ), and dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/11/2014) (ctf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LLOYD GIPSON AND EVA GIPSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-2477-L

ORDER
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 12),
filed July 16, 2013. This mortgage foreclosure case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D.
Stickney, who entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on February 20, 2014, recommending that Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss be granted and all of Plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed with prejudice. No objections were
filed to the Report. Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 12), and dismisses this action with
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
It is so ordered this 11th day of March, 2014.

_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order –Solo Page