Malone v. White
Filing
8
ORDER: After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), including de novo review of those portions to which objection was made, the Court finds that the 6 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/26/2013) (ctf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MARVIN L. MALONE, 411853,
Petitioner,
JUDGE ERNEST WHITE, 194th Criminal
)
)
)
)
)
)
District Court of Dallas,
Respondent.
)
)
v.
No. 3:13-CV-2633-N
ORDER
After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b), including de novo review of
those portions to which objection was made, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
Signed this 26th day of August, 2013.
DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?