Wells v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 21

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion re: 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bank of America NA. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed 9/19/2013 (doc. 4 ), is GRANTE D in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant for an accounting is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Remaining for trial are Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, limitation of actions under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.035, quiet title, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/12/2014) (cea)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GARY WELLS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3658-M ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed September 19, 2013 (doc. 4), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant for an accounting is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Remaining for trial are Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract, limitation of actions under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.035, quiet title, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. SIGNED this 12th day of September, 2014. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?