Onyancha et al v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation et al

Filing 19

Order Accepting 16 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. Any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/6/2015) (jrr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PETER ONYANCHA &
LAWRENCE M. HILL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-4012-N-BK

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court CERTIFIES that, in the event Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th
Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court finds that any
appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be
frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2015.

_______________________________________
DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE