Copeland v. D&J Construction LLC et al

Filing 67

Order Accepting 62 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. Defendant's [sic] Motion to Exclude/Dismiss Individual Natural Persons of L.L.C. from Litigation, filed 4/1/2014 (doc. 32) is granted in part, and the plaintiff's usury, breach of implied contract, sworn account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment claims against Darrell Gray and Ethel Yolanda Gray are dismissed. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/6/2015) (jrr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BRUCE COPELAND, Plaintiff, § § § § § § § vs. D & J CONSTRUCTION LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 3:13-CV-4432-N-BH Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, Defendant’s [sic] Motion to Exclude/Dismiss Individual Natural Persons of L.L.C. from Litigation, filed April 1, 2014 (doc. 32) is GRANTED in part, and the plaintiff’s usury, breach of implied contract, sworn account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment claims against Darrell Gray and Ethel Yolanda Gray are DISMISSED. SIGNED this 6th day of February, 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?