McBride v. Valdez

Filing 10

Order Accepting 9 Findings and Recommendations on Case. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/8/2014) (jrr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MATTHEW KEITH MCBRIDE,
Plaintiff,
V.
SHERIFF LUPE VALDEZ,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

No. 3:13-cv-4629-M

ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions and a
Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the
proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the
Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good
faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and
incorporates by reference the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir.
1997). Based on the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court finds that
any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would,
therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2014.

_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS