Mba et al v. HSBC Bank USA National Association et al

Filing 54

Order Accepting 53 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court grants Defendants' 49 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/12/2016) (axm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ANTHONY MBA AND OLIVIA MBA, Plaintiffs, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A. AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-4769-L ORDER Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 49), filed July 29, 2015. On December 4, 2015, Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) recommending that the court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss with prejudice this action. No response to the motion or objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the motion, evidence, pleadings, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. The court concludes that no genuine dispute of material fact exists with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims of breach of contract and alleged violations of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act and that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 49) and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants by separate document pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Order – Page 1 It is so ordered this 12th day of January, 2016. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?