Randolph v. Comerica Bank et al

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING 25 and 27 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's Civil Complaint and Lawsuit (doc. 24 ) and Clarification and Written Opinion and Motion to Amend the Judgment (doc. 26 ) are DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/9/2014) (ctf)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
WILLIAM J. RANDOLPH,
ID # 250257,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMERICA BANK, et. al,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO.:
3:13-CV-4810-B

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the
Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings
and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s Civil Complaint and Lawsuit (doc. 24) and Clarification and
Written Opinion and Motion to Amend the Judgment (doc. 25) are DENIED.
SIGNED this 9th day of July, 2014.

_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE